JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This revision has been filed against the order dated 21.2.2002, passed by learned 17th Additional Sessions Judge (F.T.C.), Bulandshahr in S.T. No. 802
of 2001 ( State Vs. Rajendra and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 217
of 1999, under Sections 498 -A and 307 I.P.C. and ¾ of D.P. Act, Police
Station Siyana, District Bulandshahr, whereby the learned court below has
framed charges against the revisionists.
Heard Sri A.B.L. Gaur, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the
revisionists and learned A.G.A.
(2.) Learned counsel for the revisionists has submitted that the charges framed against the revisionist under Section 147, 302/149, 304 -B and 498A I.P.C.
and ¾ of D.P. Act were not warranted as there is no material on record for
framing charge under aforesaid sections. The submission of learned counsel
for the revisionist is that the statement of Rajkali, mother of Maya, the
deceased, before the Magistrate concerned is very specific that the revisionists
are not at all involved in the alleged crime. He has further submitted that the
revisionists took Maya from Bulandshahar to Delhi and got her admitted in
Safdarjung Hospital and there is no eye witness account of the alleged
incident to show the participation of revisionists in the alleged crime and the
deceased was living separately from her in laws and with her husband.
Therefore framing of charges against the revisionists is illegal and perverse
(3.) Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the aforesaid submissions of learned counsel for the revisionist by contending that the deceased bride has met an
unnatural death by burning within 7 years of marriage. Specific roles have
been assigned to all the revisionists in the F.I.R. itself which itself is sufficient
ground to frame charge. He has further submitted that framing of alternative
charge under Section 302 of I.P.C. alongwith Section 304 -B I.P.C. is also
necessary in wake of guidelines of Apex and the court below has not
committed any illegality by framing charges under the aforesaid sections.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.