JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This is an application under
section 482 Cr. P.C. for quashing the proceedings of Criminal Case No. 1254 of 2003,
Smt. Jaya Mishra Vs. Pankaj Mishra and
another.
(2.) The facts relevant for disposal of this
application are that the complainant oppo
site party no. 2 filed a complaint against the
accused applicants under sections 406, 504,
506 I.P.C. with these allegations that her
. marriage had taken place with the accused
Pankaj Mishra on 16.2.1997 and sufficient
dowry valuing several lacs of rupees was
given. However, her husband and her mother
in law (present accused applicants) were not
satisfied with dowry and they asked the
complainant that she should get a house transferred
to their names from her father. Her
father expressed his inability to do so, and
therefore the accused started to commit
atrocities upon her and on 9.6.97 they forced
her to leave the house. They also kept with
them the entire items of dowry which were
her Stridhan. She therefore filed a complaint
against the accused persons and after re
cording the statements of complainant and
her witnesses, the learned magistrate sum
moned the accused persons under sections
406, 504, 506 I.P.C. Being aggrieved with
that order the accused filed the present ap
plication under section 482 Cr. P.C. for
quashing the same.
(3.) It may be mentioned that the accused
Pankaj Misra also filed Matrimonial Suit No.
612 of 2002 against the complainant Jaya
Misra under section 13 of Hindu Marriage
Act for divorce in the Family Court Allahabad
and in that case a compromise was filed by
the parties whereby the parties agreed to dissolution
of marriage. It was further provided
that Pankaj Misra would pay to Jaya Misra
a sum of Rs. 2 lacs as permanent alimony
in lieu of Stridhan and maintenance etc. This
amount ws paid to Smt. Jaya Misra. The
compromise was also' verified by both the
parties before the Family Court, Allahabad.
A copy of the compromise and the order
passed by the Family Court on that compromise
have been filed in this Misc. application. It has
been provided in paragraphs
no. 12 and 13 of the compromise petition
that this criminal case under sections 406,
504, 506 I.P.C. shall not be pressed in view
of this compromise and the same procedure
shall be adopted in this Misc. case also after
filing a certified copy of the compromise
and the order passed by the court on the
petition.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.