JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Brief facts relating to this case
are that on a report submitted by the
Lekhpal, a notice was given by the Tehsildar
to the petitioner and after considering the
reply as well as on perusal of record, by order
dated 15-1-2004 the proceedings against
the petitioner were dropped. Thereafter on
some application filed by respondent No. 5,
the order dated 15-1-2004 was recalled on
15-5-2004 without notice to the petitioner.
Challenging the said order the petitioner filed
a revision which has been dismissed on 30-11-2004.
Aggrieved by the aforesaid orders,
the petitioner has filed this writ petition.
(2.) I have heard learned counsel for the
petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel
appearing for respondents Nos. 1 and 2,
Sri V. K. Singh for respondent No. 3, Sri.
Mahtab Alam for respondent No. 4 and Sri
N.S.Chahar for respondent No. 5. Counter
and rejoinder affidavits have been exchanged
and with the consent of the learned
counsel for the parties, this writ petition is
being disposed of at the admission stage itself.
(3.) The short question involved in this
writ petition is that whether the order passed
in favour of a party could have been recalled
without notice to the said party.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.