JUDGEMENT
SHIV SHANKER, J. -
(1.) THIS case was initiated upon a show cause notice issued in Criminal
Misc. Bail Application NO. 5756 of 2001,
Mohan Lal Vs. State of U.P., by this
Court against the contemner Nepal Singh
son of Ram Charan.
(2.) BRIEF facts, arising out of this case, are that Chhotey Lal son of Jawahar
Lal lodged an F.I.R. on 13.2.1998 at
11.25 A.M., at Police Station Bisharatganj, district Bareilly wherein it
was stated that his younger brother Net
Ram had kept the wife of Har Prasad,
who was murdered by his brother Mohan
Lal one year ago of the present
occurrence. Therefore, due to keeping the
wife of Har Prasad, Mohan Lal harboured
ill-will. On 12.12.1998, at about 7.30
P.M.,. Mohan Lal accused reached near
Net Ram, who was warning under a tree
at his house along with companion, his
nephew Prem Pal and others. Mohan Lal
and his companion surrounded Net Ram
who stood and run away towards his
house where Mohan Lal fired two shots
upon Net Ram in his court-yard and his
companions attacked him with sword. Net
Ram consequently died on the spot.
Whereafter Smt. Surajmukhi, wife of Net
Ram deceased, was taken towards the
jungle of the village. Thereafter the case
under sections 302/366IPC was registered
against the accused.
During the course of investigation, the name of accused
Bhagwan Das was also come into light on
the basis of the criminal conspiracy. The
name of Nanhey was disclosed by the
prosecution witnesses in this occurrence.
(3.) LATER on the bail application of Nanhey son of Lakhan was allowed by
the Sessions Judge granting bail to him.
Thereafter bail application was moved by
Mohan Lal in the sessions court Bareilly
on the ground of parity but the same was
rejected by the Sessions Judge, Bareilly
finding no case of parity. Thereafter bail
application of Mohan Lal was moved
before this Court wherein all the facts are
mentioned in the bail application. Copy of
the F.I.R. was also annexed and the
affidavit was sworn by contemner Nepal
Singh by filing his affidavit. At the time
of hearing the argument in the bail
application in this Court, learned A.G.A.
has pointed out that the copy of F.I.R.
(annexure-1) filed on behalf of accused in
support of the bail application is
fabricated and incomplete copy of the
F.I.R.. There is no clear averment that
Mohan Lal accused made two fires in the
court-yard of the house of deceased which
portion of the F.I.R. has been left out
deliberately in the copy of F.I.R.
(annexure-1). Thereafter the following
order was passed by this Court after
rejecting the bail application of Mohan
Lal accused:-
"Let a notice be issued against him fixing 13.4.2001 to show cause why he be not punished for filing false affidavit before the court. List on 13.4.2001 as part-heard before this court. Office is further directed to keep the record of Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 5756 of 2001 in a sealed cover. " ;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.