AMIT AGARWAL Vs. STATE OF U P
LAWS(ALL)-2006-11-247
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on November 01,2006

AMIT AGARWAL Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF U P Respondents

JUDGEMENT

BARKAT ALI ZAIDI, J. - (1.) THE applicant -husband has come to this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. with a request that proceedings (in Case No. 76 of 2005 Bobby Rani v. Amit Agarwal), under Section 125 Cr.P.C., pending in the Court of J.M. (CBI) Ghaziabad be quashed.
(2.) THE ground on which he seeks termination of the proceedings is that he was 20 years old at the time of marriage with opposite party No. 2 Bobby Rani and had, therefore, not attained the age of majority and the marriage was, therefore, void in accordance with the provisions of Section 5(iii) of The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Section 5(iii) of The Hindu Marriage Act is as follows : "5(iii) the bridegroom has completed the age of (twenty one years) and the bride, the age of (eighteen years) at the time of the marriage." The applicant says that he has filed a suit for declaration of marriage being void, which is pending.
(3.) THE matter is being decided at the stage of admission, after hearing his Counsel Sri Samar Singh and notice has not been issued to the respondent -wife.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.