JUDGEMENT
IMTIYAZ MURTAZA, J. -
(1.) This jail appeal has
been filed against the judgment and
order dated 17-5-2002 passed by Addl. District & Sessions Judge, F.T.C. No. 5, Agra
whereby the appellant is convicted under
Section 302 I.P.C. and sentenced to imprisonment for life.
(2.) The report of the occurrence was lodged
by Kali Charan at P.S. Khandauli, district
Agra on 19-10-1998. According to the allegations of the first information report, on
19-10-1998 in the noon his son Charan
Singh and nephew Pramod Kumar were
grazing their cattle near the brick-kiln of
Netrapal Singh. At about 3.00 p.m. Suresh
Baghel resident of Vijaygarhi, P.S. Tundala,
district Firozabad reached there and chased
away the cattle. When Pramod stopped the
cattle being driven away, Suresh
strangulated his son Charan Singh with a cloth.
Pramod raised alarm and Suresh ran away
by leaving the cloth around the neck of his
son. The villagers had removed the cloth
from the neck of Charan Singh but till that
time he was already dead. Mahesh Chand,
son of Yad Ram, Pooran Singh son of
Jhamman Singh and Jagvir Singh son of
Takam Singh son of Jhamman Singh and
Jagvir Singh son of Tikam Singh brought
the dead body in front of the house of Ninnu
Ram and several family members were also
collected there. It is further alleged that
Suresh had teased his niece on the day of
Rakshabandhan and he had scolded him.
Suresh was brother-in-law of his cousin
Ram Prakash and on account of this relationship no action was taken against Suresh
for teasing and Suresh had also threatened
him that as he had insulted him, he will take
revenge before Deepawali. On account of this
enmity he had strangulated his son Charan
Singh. The report was registered at 5.15 p.m.
The distance of the police station was 9 Kms.
(3.) After the registration of the case S.I.
Rama Shankar Misra had commenced investigation. He had recorded the statement
of the scribe Bhagwan Singh and Kali
Charan, the informant, and reached at the
place of occurrence and prepared the inquest
report which was Ext. Ka. 4. He had also
prepared the letter to C.M.O. for
the postmortem examination which is Ext. Ka. 6. He
had also prepared the challan lash and
Naksha lash which are Exts. Ka. 7 and Ka.
8. He had recovered the cloth near the dead
body and prepared its recovery memo which
is Ext. Ka. 9. He had also recorded
the statements of Pramod, Kali Charan and Lakhan
Singh etc. and prepared the site plan which
is Ext. Ka. 10. He had investigated the case
up till 20-10-1998. Thereafter the investigation
was handed over to S.I. Veerpal Singh
Sirohi who had submitted the charge-sheet which is Ext. Ka. 11.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.