JUDGEMENT
Vinod Prasad, J. -
(1.) Heard learned
Counsel for the revisionist and the learned A.G.A.
(2.) The application under section 156(3),
Cr.P.C. indicated that the offence of dacoity
of worth Rs. 3 lacs. The said offence was a
cognizable offence and the prayer, which was
made by the revisionist, was for direction the
police to register the cognizable offence under
section 156(3), Cr.P.C. The Magistrate by
refusing the said prayer on 10.10.2006 by
passing the impugned order has committed a
manifest error of law as Magistrate under
section 156(3), Cr.P.C. cannot on his own
convert an application to one under complaint.
The prayer made in the application was for
registration and investigation of the case. The
aggrieved person never wanted the Magistrate
to take cognizance in respect of offence to start
the lis. To start lis is the domain of the
aggrieved person. The Magistrate cannot start
litigation by suo motu conversion of an
application under section 156(3), Cr.P.C. to
one under section 2(d), Cr.P.C. and take
cognizance to the offence under Chapter XV.
The aggrieved person may have thousands of
reasons for not filing a complaint. Once he
has not opted to file a complaint it was wholly
illegal on the part of the Magistrate to convert
the application under section 156(3), Cr. P. C.
under Chapter XII to one under Chapter XV
of the Criminal Procedure Code. Filing of a
complaint and prosecution of a case as the
complaint case is the responsibility and domain
of the complainant on the aggrieved person.
The Magistrate cannot compel the person to
file a complaint. The law laid down by the Apex
Court is that if cognizable offence is disclosed
in an application under section 156(3), Cr. P. C.
the Magistrate is under legal duty to direct the
police to exercise their plenary power of
investigation.
(3.) In this view of the matter, the impugned
order dated 10.10.2006 passed by A.C.J.M.
Court No. 2, District Allahabad, under section
156(3), Cr. P. C. is hereby set aside. The matter
is remanded back to the A.C.J.M. Court No. 2,
Allahabad and he is directed to take up the
application filed by the revisionist afresh under
section 156(3), Cr.P.C. and pass a reasoned
order in accordance with law.
With the aforesaid direction this revision is allowed.
Revision allowed.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.