- (1.) Heard counsel for the petitioner and Shri H.S.N. Tripathi for Union of India.
(2.) The contention of the petitioner is that as a result of the decision given by Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (C.E.G.A.T.), the petitioner has become entitled to refund and for that it applied by an application dated 18-3-1993 (Annexure 2 to the writ petition) which is said to be still pending with respondent No. 2.
(3.) It is a matter of great regret that the petitioner should come to this Court to seek a mandamus for such purpose.;