PANNA LAL Vs. JAI DEVI
LAWS(ALL)-1995-3-27
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on March 08,1995

PANNA LAL Appellant
VERSUS
JAI DEVI Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) HEARD the counsel for the petitioner. Respondent Nos. 2 and 4 are represented by the State Counsel notices on the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 be effected under the registered cover to be submitted within two days returnable within two weeks.
(2.) THIS petition has been filed against the recovery order whereby a sum of Rs. 11,600 is being recovered from the petitioner which is to be paid as maintenance cost to the respondent Nos. 1 and 2, the mother and the son. The matter is pending in the Family Court and against an interim order, the petitioner came to this court in the year 1994. THIS Court directed the peti tioner to pay a consolidated amount of Rs. 350 per mouth a; maintenance to both, the mother and the son, during the pendency of the proceeding. It ap pears that the matter is still pending and has not been finally disposed of. In the meanwhile warrant of arrest has been issued again the petitioner for the recovery of the amount. In all such matters, the Family Court should make effort for compro mise between the parties and they should cooperate in such matters. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner States that the petitioner is ready to keep his wife and child and the matter may be used. In order to have instruction and file a compromise application we are issuing notices to the ties and they may come up with, an application for compromises. In the meanwhile, some interim arrangement may be made for the maintenance of the lady and the child and as directed by this Court an interim amount of Rs. 350 has to be paid but for the time being we direct that the petitioner shall pay a lump sum amount of Rs. 3,000 within one week from today. The petitioner shall pay the cash amount of Rs. 3,000 within one week to respondent No. 1 personally and shall obtain a receipt from her. If this amount shall not be paid within this period, the warrant of arrest shall be exe cuted. The recovery proceeding and the warrant of arrest in pursuance thereof shall remain stayed for the time being.
(3.) LIST this petition on 3-4-1995. Order accordingly. .;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.