JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) SRI Triloki Singh was a candidate for election to Lok Sabha from the Lucknow District Central
constituency. The two other candidates were Srimati Sheorajvati Nehru and Sri Atal Behari
bajpai. All the processes of the election took place up to 27-2-1955. Thereafter the counting of
votes commenced from 1-3-1955. Tin's petition was filed on 2-3-1955 under Articles 226 and
227 of the Constitution of India praying for certain directions to to be issued and for a
declaration to be made that the counting of votes on 1-3-1955 was invalid and inoperative in law. The direction that was asked for was to the effect that the Returning Officer should be prohibited
from following the result of, what is called, his "illegal procedure" in counting votes and should
not prepare and certify the return in form No. XVI and should not cause it to be published in the
gazette. An interim order for the sealing of necessary papers was also prayed for but that order
was not issued and must now be left out of consideration.
(2.) THE question that first of all is to be considered, on a preliminary objection being raised on
behalf of the Returning Officer, is whether this Court has jurisdiction to issue a writ in this
matter which relates to an election, even supposing all the allegations made in the application to
be correct, though this is not accepted by the Returning Officer. The question of law which has, therefore, arisen is whether I can exercise the powers of the High
court under Article 226 of the Constitution arid issue a writ either of certiorari or of mandamus
in respect of the action of the Returning Officer.
(3.) THE matter is governed by authorities. The first decision is a decision of a Bench of this Court
of which I Was a member. In, that decision it has been laid down that Article 329, Clause (b) of
the Constitution prevents an interference by the High Court by the issue of a writ in all matters
relating to an election. It was further held that the word "election" as used in that Article is wide enough to cover" every
part of the process of selection of a representative. It was, therefore, held that this Court could
not issue a writ in the matter of the proper or improper rejection of a nomination paper.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.