AZRA PARVEEN Vs. STATE OF U P
LAWS(ALL)-2015-4-45
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on April 15,2015

Azra Parveen Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF U P Respondents

JUDGEMENT

DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, J. - (1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rajiv Singh Chauhan, learned counsel appearing for BSA, Sitapur.
(2.) SUBMISSION of learned counsel for the petitioner is that in the application form for appointment as Assistant Teacher in place of the name of her father, the petitioner has written the name of her mother and further while describing the TET Roll number, some mistake has crept in and one digit in the said roll number has wrongly been indicated. His further submission is that the aforesaid mistake are a result of human error and for such humanly possible error, the petitioner is being deprived of her right of consideration of appointment though she is legally entitled to the same.
(3.) ON the basis of instructions received, learned counsel appearing for BSA has submitted that one post for the petitioner has been reserved pending final decision to be taken by the authorities in the matter. He has also stated that the District Basic Education Officer, Sitapur has apprised the aforesaid mistake of the petitioner which has crept in inadvertently in her application form to the Secretary, Basic Education Board, Allahabad. He has also stated that the District Selection Committee in its meeting held on 12.01.2014 has taken decision to proceed with the guidance of Secretary, Basic Education Board, Allahabad. The Secretary, Basic Education Board, Allahabad by means of his letter dated 23.01.2014 has directed the Basic Education Officer to take decision in the matter through the District Selection Committee. Till date, no decision in the matter has been taken by the District Selection Committee. Accordingly, the writ petition is finally disposed of with the direction to the Basic Education Officer, Sitapur and the Chairman, District Level Selection Committee (for appointment on the post of Assistant Teacher, Urdu), District Sitapur to convene the meeting of the Selection Committee within a period of six weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order and consider the case of the petitioner sympathetically and keeping in view the fact that the error in her application form has crept in which can be attributed to humanly possible mistake. The decision so taken by the District Selection Committee shall be communicated to the petitioner.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.