RAMESH CHANDRA BAJPAI Vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ORS.
LAWS(ALL)-2015-9-136
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on September 04,2015

RAMESH CHANDRA BAJPAI Appellant
VERSUS
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax And Ors. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the respondents.
(2.) DURING search and seizure operation made under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, savings bank account No. 1852000300087594 of the petitioner existing at Punjab National Bank, Banthara, Lucknow has been attached and the amount of cash Rs. 1,65,28,000/ - available in the bank account has been seized on 25.02.2013. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that under the assessment proceeding, the liability as has been assessed by the Assessing Officer is Rs. 70,28,607/ - for different assessment years and accordingly the total demand of Rs. 70,28,607/ - has been created against the petitioner, however, he has possessed the amount of Rs. 1,65,28,000/ - from the saving bank account No. 1852000300087594. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that under the provisions of Section 132 -B of the Income Tax Act, the Assessing Officer is under statutory liability to release the balance amount, however, the period as has been prescribed in the Act has expired but till date no balance amount has been released to the petitioner. The petitioner has also represented to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Central Circle), Lucknow for release of the amount on 15.05.2015 and 18.06.2015 but no attention has been paid on the petitioners' representation.
(3.) IN reply, Mr. Manish Mishra, learned counsel for the Revenue has submitted that Central Board of Direct Taxation (CBDT) has issued instructions, which is numbered as Instruction No. 11/2006 dated 01.12.2006. Under the Instructions, it has been provided that the cash deposited in PD account is to be dealt with the following manner: "I..... II. The amount lying in PD A/c should be released within one month of passing of the assessment order after adjusting the seized cash against any existing liability and the amount of liability determined on completion of search assessment and in case penalty proceedings are initiated, retaining an amount to meet the expected liability on account of penalty imposable.";


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.