STATE OF U P Vs. VIRENDRA PRATAP SINGH
LAWS(ALL)-2015-5-420
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on May 29,2015

STATE OF U P Appellant
VERSUS
VIRENDRA PRATAP SINGH Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) ALL the above writ petitions involve common questions, therefore, they were clubbed and heard together and are now being decided by a common judgment. Writ Petition No.1326 of 2014 (SB), State of U.P. and anr. v. Virendra Pratap Singh and anr., has been heard as the leading writ petition.
(2.) HEARD the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the petitioner -State and the learned counsel for the private respondent.
(3.) BY means of this writ petition the State of U.P. has challenged the judgment passed by the U.P. State Public Services Tribunal in the claim petition filed by the private respondents claiming his promotion to the post of Assistant Engineer (Civil) with effect from 1993 -94 with all consequential benefits on the ground that the persons, junior to him, namely Sri Manik Chand and Sri Prem Pal Singh were promoted with effect from the said year, whereas he was promoted with effect from 1998 -99. By means of the impugned judgment the Tribunal has directed the petitioners herein to consider the claim of the private respondents for promotion notionally to the post of Assistant Engineer (Civil) from the selection year 1993 -94 under the Degree Quota of Junior Engineers, with all consequential service benefits permissible as per rules. Such promotions shall be subject to the order dated 27.11.2006 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the S.L.P. No.CC 8786 of 2006.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.