JUDGEMENT
M. C. Jain, J. -
(1.) -These two writ petitions are related to each other and we propose to decide them together.
(2.) NECESSARY facts may be stated to get the hang of the controversy. In both the writ petitions the main respondent is Arsi Yusuf (wife) arayed as respondent No. 4 in Writ Petition No. 822 of 2000 and respondent No. 5 in Writ Petition No. 5159 of 2002. Nadeem Khalil (husband) is petitioner No. 5 in Writ Petition No. 822 of 2000 and petitioner No. 1 in Writ Petition No. 5159 of 2002. Khalil Ahmad Khan-father of Nadeem Khalil is petitioner No. 2 in both the writ petitions. Other remaining petitioners in the two writ petitions are other family members and relatives of Nadeem Khalil (husband). In Writ Petition No. 822 of 2000, the petitioners sought the quashing of the F.I.R. dated 30.1.2000 in Case Crime No. 32 of 2000 under Sections 498A/323/504/506/307, I.P.C. and 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act as well as stay of their arrest. The copy of the F.I.R. is Annexure-5 to Writ Petition No. 822 of 2000. Nadeem Khalil (husband) filed his own affidavit in support of the said writ petition. As per the averments contained in the writ petition. Arsi Yusuf was married to Nadeem Khalil in November, 1998, but marital relations did not go smooth and divorce was allegedly effected through a talaqnama dated 12.12.1999. Nadeem Khalil however, allegedly received threats from Arsi Yusuf on phone that unless the petitioner paid an amount of Rs. 5 lacs, they would be implicated falsely in various criminal cases. Nadeem Khalil filed a civil suit in the Court of Civil Judge (S.D.), Aligarh, being O.S. No. 106 of 2000, praying for a decree that she be restrained from claiming herself to be his wife and not to enter his house. However, she lodged the instant F.I.R. against the petitioners at P. S. Khatauli, district Muzaffarnagar, making the following false allegations : ...[VERNACULAR TEXT OMMITED]...
The said offence was allegedly committed near the canal within P.S. Khatauli of Muzaffarnagar district.
It was, inter alia, averred in Writ Petition No. 822 of 2000 that on 30.1.2000 Nadeem Khalil had been on duty as invigilator in Aligarh Muslim University, where he was a lecturer and a certificate allegedly issued in this respect by the Superintendent of Examination on 3.2.2000 was annexed as Annexure-6 to the writ petition.
(3.) ON 11.2.2000, this Court stayed the arrest of the petitioners of Writ Petition No. 822 of 2000 in the aforesaid case crime directing the issuance of notices and asking for counter and rejoinder-affidavits. However, the investigation was ordered to continue and the petitioners were directed to make themselves available to the Investigating Officer for interrogation whenever required.
Arsi Yusuf (wife) filed counter-affidavit. She prayed for vacation of the stay order and also for initiating criminal proceedings against the petitioners for filing false and fabricated document (Annexure-6 to the writ petition). She reiterated the allegations made in the F.I.R. in question. According to her, with a view to defraud and obtain an ex parte order of stay of arrest, her husband falsely alleged that on 30.1.2000, the date in question, he had been on duty as Invigilator in Aligarh University. In the counter-affidavit filed on her behalf of her pairokar P. K. Chhabra, (sworn on 22.2.2000), photostat copy of the letter dated 7.2.2000 allegedly written by Prof. F. A. Ansari, Superintendent of Examinations, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, together with photostat copy of list of invigilators dated 30.1.2000, had been filed to indicate that Nadeem Khalil was not at all on invigilation duty on 30.1.2000 from 2.30 p.m. to 5.30 p.m. as falsely shown in Annexure-6 to the writ petition filed by the petitioners. As per the photostat copy of his letter dated 7.2.2000, the said Prof. F.A. Ansari never issued any such certificate. Prof. Khalil Ahmad was the Principal of the Engineering College and had allegedly exerted pressure for issuance of false certificate of invigilation duty in favour of his son Nadeem Khalil. Prof. F. A. Ansari denied his signatures on the certificate (Annexure-6), a copy of which was also annexed with the counter-affidavit filed by P. K. Chhabra on behalf of Arsi Yusuf. He even purported to submit his resignation as Superintendent of Examinations though his letter dated 7.2.2000 addressed to the Vice Chancellor of Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.