JUDGEMENT
Tarun Agarwala -
(1.) -The petitioner was issued an appointment letter dated 10.9.1986 on the post of a Watchman on a temporary basis subject to the condition, that in the event Sri Shambhu Nath Misra joins, the petitioner's term would come to an end. It transpires that Shambhu Nath Misra returned and joined his services on 6.5.1988. Consequently, the appointment of the petitioner on the post of Watchman came to an end. It further transpires that the Management issued another appointment letter dated 8.7.1988 appointing the petitioner to lookafter the cycle stand. It is alleged that the petitioner is continuing on this post till date. The petitioner alleged that from 1988 till the year 2001, several Class-IV posts fell vacant in which the petitioner could be adjusted but the Management, for reasons best known, did not adjust or regularise the services of the petitioner. The petitioner further alleged that even today, two Class-IV posts are still lying vacant in which the petitioner could be absorbed. The stand taken by the petitioner is, that he is a retrenched employee and is liable to be absorbed under Section 16EE of the U. P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). Consequently, the petitioner has prayed that a writ of mandamus be issued to the Principal and the Management of the respondent Institution to forward his name for being appointed as a Class-IV employee against a vacant post.
(2.) ON the other hand, the learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 3 and 4 submitted, that the petitioner was appointed on a temporary basis subject to certain conditions and was not holding a permanent post, therefore, the provisions of Section 16EE of the Act are not applicable. Even otherwise, the petitioner did not make any application for absorption within the stipulated period under the said provisions and, therefore, was not entitled for any relief.
Heard Sri C. K. Parekh, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Smt. Sunita Agarwal, the learned counsel for respondent Nos. 3 and 4 and the learned standing counsel for respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
The claim of the petitioner is, that he is a retrenched employee and that he can be absorbed in the Institution under Section 16EE of the Act. For facility, Section 16EE of the Act is quoted below :
"16EE. Absorption of retrenched employee.-(1) Where any employee of an institution has been retrenched on or after July 1, 1974, but before the commencement of the Intermediate Education (Amendment) Act, 1980 and such employee possesses minimum qualifications prescribed therefor on the date of initial appointment the Regional Deputy Director of Education shall, on the application made in this behalf, direct that subject to the provisions of this section, such employee be absorbed against any permanent vacancy occurring in the same or any other institution situate in any district within his jurisdiction : Provided that in the case of an employee retrenched on or after the date of such commencement the Regional Deputy Director of Education may issue directions under this section without any application from the employee concerned. (2) Every application referred to in sub-section (1) shall be made within six months from the date of commencement of the Intermediate Education (Amendment) Act, 1980. (3) Where any direction is issued by the Regional Deputy Director of Education under sub-section (1) the following consequences shall ensue, namely : (i) The Committee of Management of the institution concerned shall be bound to comply with every such directions, and the employee in whose favour such direction is issued shall be deemed to be an employee of such institution from the date of the order of appointment issued by the Committee to him or from the expiry of a period of two months from the date of service of the direction on the Committee of Management under sub-section (1), whichever is earlier. (ii) The period of substantive service rendered by such employees in any institution before the date of his retrenchment shall be counted for the purposes of his seniority and pension. (iii) Where the employee concerned fails to join the post within the time allowed thereafter, the benefits of this section shall not be available to him. (4) Any person aggrieved by the direction issued under sub-section (1) may make a representation to the Director within one month from the date of service on him of such direction, and the order of the Director thereon shall be final. (5) The provisions of this section shall have effect notwithstanding anything contained in any other provisions of this Act or any other law for the time being in force. (6) Nothing in this section shall apply to an institution established and administered by a minority referred to in clause (1) of Article 30 of the Constitution of India. Explanation. - For the purposes of this section- (a) 'employee' in relation to an institution means a teacher, head of institution or other employee thereof holding a permanent post on the date immediately preceding the date of retrenchment ; (b) 'institution' includes a training institution recognised by the State Government or the Director ; (c) 'retrenchment' in relation to an employee of an institution means the termination of his services for any reasons other than resignation, retirement or removal by way of punishment inflicted in disciplinary proceedings."
(3.) FROM the aforesaid the word 'retrenchment' has been defined under the Explanation which states, that in relation to an employee of an institution, retrenchment means the termination of his services for any reason other than the resignation, retirement or removal by way of punishment inflicted in a disciplinary proceeding. In the present case, the petitioner was appointed on 10.9.1986 and continued to work till 6.5.1988 when his services came to an end upon the joining of Shambhu Nath Misra. Since, the petitioner does not come under the exception clause, the petitioner became a retrenched employee.
Sub-clauses (1) and (2) of Section 16EE of the Act stipulates that every application for absorption as a retrenched employee must be made within six months from the occurrence of a permanent vacancy.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.