JUDGEMENT
AMAR SARAN, J. -
(1.) The appellant Jay
Prakash and co-accused Smt. Rajesh were
charged under Section 302 IPC for having
committed the murders of the appellants
wife Smt. Guddi by strangulating her and
the appellant's children, Gaurav and Km.
Monika, by drowning them in a well. The
two co-accused were also charged under
Section 201 IPC for having concealed the
dead body of Smt. Guddi in a haystack in a
room in the appellant's house and for concealing the dead bodies of Gaurav and
Monika in the well. The appellant Jay
Prakash was sentenced to death under Section 302 IPC by the I Additional Sessions
Judge, Bagpat. However, co-accused Smt.
Rajesh was given benefit of doubt as apart
from an allegation of having a motive to murder the deceased along with Jay Prakash
there was no other evidence against her on
record. She was living in a separate house
from the deceased and Jay Prakash. On the
night of incident no one had seen or heard
Smt. Rajesh in the vicinity of the incident.
No dead bodies had been recovered on her
information or pointing out. Both the co-
accused persons were acquitted on the
charge under Section 201 IPC, as Guddi's
dead body was lying in the house itself, and
the children's bodies had been recovered
from a well, and there was no material to
substantiate the charge that the accused
had made any effort to conceal the evidence.
The present criminal appeal and criminal
reference under Section 366 Cr.P.C. for confirmation of the sentence of death arise from
the aforesaid judgment of the learned Sessions Judge, Baghpat, dated 5-6-2004.
(2.) An FIR was lodged by Ramvir, father
of the deceased, Smt. Guddi, at PS Balaini,
alleging that his daughter Guddi had been
married to the appellant Jay Prakash 12
years earlier. The appellant was involved in
wrong doings, which were resented by
Guddi. The informant and others also tried
to check the appellant but to no avail. On
26-8-2000 information was received by
Ramvir in the morning that Jay Prakash had
throttled Guddi in the night and committed her murder and that Guddi's daughter,
Monika, aged 10 years, and son Gaurav,
aged 7 years, were absent from the house.
It appeared that Jay Prakash with the help
of some others had also murdered the children and hidden them somewhere. Many
villagers were present near the dead body of
Guddi in the village. On the basis of the information furnished by Ramvir, an FIR was
registered under Sections 302 and 364 IPC
against the appellant by Head Moharrir
Sukhvir Singh, PW 8, on 26-8-2000 at 7.35
a.m. The report was lodged in the presence
of PW 9, SI, Digambar Singh, SHO, PS
Balaini, who commenced investigation in the
case. He took down the statements of the
witnesses concerned with the preparation
of the report and inspected the site after
reaching there and prepared the site-plan
(Ext. Ka-12). He conducted inquest on the
dead body of 'Smt. Guddi (Ext. Ka-13) and
duly sent the dead body for postmortem. He
also effected the arrest of the appellant Jay
Prakash on the same day with the aid of Sri
Preetam Singh, PW 6, SO of PS Aminnagar
Sarai. He recorded the confessional statement of the appellant Jay Prakash and on
the pointing out of Jai Prakash, in the presence of other members of the appellant's
family and the public and with the help of
SO Preetam Singh, he got the dead bodies
of Monika and Gaurav recovered from a well.
The recovery memos of the dead bodies (Ext
Ka 4) were scribed by SI Moti Singh on his
dictation. SI Moti Singh also prepared the
inquest papers of the bodies of Monika and
Gaurav and sent the same for postmortem.
A site-plan (Ext. Ka-14) of the place of recover of the dead bodies of Monika and
Gaurav were also prepared by SI Digambar
Singh, PW 9.
(3.) Postmortems were conducted on the
bodies of Smt. Guddi, Master Gaurav and
Km. Monika on 26-8-2000 at 5 pm, 5.30 pm
and 6 pm, respectively, by Dr. P.K. Sharma,
PW 3, Medical Officer, Upgraded PHC,
Bagpat.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.