JUDGEMENT
B.S.CHAUHAN, J. -
(1.) This writ petition has been filed for quashing the order
dated 31/8/2005 (Annex-1) by, which
petitioner's continuation as a Panel Lawyer
(Criminal) has been stopped under the garb
of rejecting the application for renewal of his
term.
(2.) The facts and circumstances giving
rise to this case are that vide order dated
20/10/1982 (Annex-2) petitioner's name
was included in the name of Panel Lawyer
(Criminal) by the District Magistrate and
since then he had been working continuously under the supervision and guidance
of the Public Prosecutor, District Basti and
now he is not being permitted to continue
in view of the aforesaid impugned order.
Hence this petition.
(3.) Shri U. N. Sharma, learned senior
counsel appearing for the petitioner has
submitted that the petitioner had been
appointed by the District Magistrate as a Panel
Lawyer (Criminal) vide order dated20/10/
1982 and he was kept in a reserved Category
to meet out the exigency of the work.
Petitioner's appointment was in pursuance
of the Government Order dated 09/771979
and as there was no provision of renewal of
any Panel Lawyer, the order impugned is
liable to be quashed and the petitioner is
entitled to continue as a Panel Lawyer Criminal).;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.