JUDGEMENT
Anjani Kumar, J. -
(1.) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
(2.) The petitioner-husband, plaintiff in a
matrimonial suit, aggrieved by an order passed
by the Family Court on an application filed by
the wife-defendant under Section 24 of the
Hindu Marriage Act, whereby the Family Court
has granted a sum of Rs. 1,500/- per month
as interim maintenance and a lump sum
amount of Rs. 2,000 for contesting litigation,
approached this Court by means of this writ
petition under Article 226 of the Constitution
of India.
(3.) Learned counsel for the petitioner has
submitted that the court has not considered
the fact that husband has not independent
source of income and further that he is fully
dependant on his father, therefore, the order
impugned deserves to be quashed. The provision
of Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act is
reproduced below:
"24 . Maintenance pendente lite and
expenses of proceedings.-Where in
any proceeding under this Act it appears
to the Court that either the wife or the
husband, as the case may be, has no
independent income sufficient for her
or his support and the necessary
expenses of the proceeding, it may, on
the application of the wife or the husband, order the respondent to pay to
the petitioner the expenses of the proceeding, and monthly during the
proceeding such sum as, having regard to
the petitioner's own income and the
income of the respondent, it may seem
to the Court to be reasonable :
Provided that the application for the payment of the expenses of the
proceeding and such monthly sum during the
proceeding, shall, as far as possible, be
disposed of within sixty days from the
date of service of notice on the wife or
the husband, as the case may be.";
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.