JUDGEMENT
AMITAVA LALA, J. -
(1.) The writ petitioner
herein claims to be the nominee of one Smt.
Parvati Devi wife of late Vindhyachal Rai
resident of Village Deokali Bisuhpur, Post
Kopaganj, District Mau, Uttar Pradesh. Such
nomination was made on 20th March, 1999
in two postal accounts being MIS 3400042
and 3400043 at the branch Post Office
Kopaganj, Mau. Said Smt. Parvati Devi expired
on 21st October, 1999. Thereafter, the
petitioner made application for permitting
him to operate such accounts as nominee.
The postal authority did not permit to operate.
It is said by such authority that firstly
an order for payment from the competent
Court is to be obtained thereafter claim application
will be submitted. According to the
petitioner such order is illegal. He is entitled
to operate the accounts in accordance with
Section 4 of Government Savings Banks Act,
1873.
(2.) Respondents counsel contended that
nomination in favour of the petitioner is
doubtful for various reasons which are
specifically mentioned in the counter-affidavit
as follows :-
(a) Nominee seems to be under different
another caste.
(b) The name and address of the writer
of the thumb Impression have not been
noted with date.
(c) Space provided for the introducer of
the account, the thumb impression of the
deceased has been affixed;
(d) The name and address of the introduced
is not legible as also there is no signature of the identifier.
(e) Rectification of the omission revised
SB-3 .was called for from Sub Post Master
Kopaganj for registration of the nomination.
The Sub Post Master Kopagang was suitably
instructed that without rectifying the
omission, no nomination will be entertained.
(f) No record is available in the Post
Office Kopaganj with the revised SB-3 and Pass
Book of above noted MIS Account has been
sent to Head Post Office Mau in between
March 99 and November 99. As per the statement
of one postal official named Sri Gaya
Prasad the Pass Book and SB-3 were
brought to Head Post Office Mau through
the petitioner himself and nomination was
registered. Sri Gaya Prasad was on leave in
the month of August, 99 but got the nomination
registered on 12th August, 1999.
Nexus or connection between the petitioner
and postal assistant known as Gaya Prasad
indicated mala fide intention. The petitioner
in connivance with some postal officials got
nomination registered.
(g) The nomination was made after a period
of five months from the date of opening
of the account.
(3.) The nomination register is a confidential
record of the Post Office, but the petitioner
got the serial number of nomination
without seeing the record and nomination
register and registration etc. for which Postal
Authority became apprehensive.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.