IQBAL AHAMAD Vs. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION DEOARIA
LAWS(ALL)-2005-2-141
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on February 25,2005

IQBAL AHAMAD Appellant
VERSUS
Deputy Director Of Consolidation Deoaria Respondents

JUDGEMENT

S.N.SRIVASTAVA,J. - (1.) THIS writ petition is directed against the order dated 9.5.2003, passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Deoria allowing the revision of Gaon Sabha setting aside orders of allotment made by subordinate Consolidation Authorities in respect of Plot No. 757 and further quashing order determining valuation and inclusion of Plot No. 757 in petitioners ' Chak no. 15.
(2.) IT is borne out from the record that Plot no. 757 area 13 Acre was recorded as Garhi in the Khata of Gaon Sabha and was not included in the consolidation scheme, but subsequently by an order of correction passed by Consolidation Officer this plot was included in the consolidation scheme by determining valuation of eight Anna and it was allotted in the chak of petitioners. An appeal preferred by Gaon Sabha against the said order was dismissed vide order dated 13.4.1998 but revision preferred against appellate order was allowed and the plot in question was restored to Gaon Sabha. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the record. Learned counsel for the petitioners urged that there is no prohibition in U.P. Consolidation of Holding Act (hereinafter in short referred to as the U.P.C.H. Act) for allotment of Gaon Sabha property recorded as Garhi (land mentioned in revenue record as covered by water) and order for inclusion of Plot No. 757 recorded as Garhi in petitioners ' chak was rightly passed in accordance with law. He further urged that as the impugned order was passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation after notification under Section 52 of the U.P.C.H. Act as such the Deputy Director of Consolidation acted illegally and without jurisdiction in passing the impugned order, the same is liable to be quashed.
(3.) I duly considered arguments of learned counsel for the petitioners and I am of the view that none of the arguments pressed by the learned counsel for the petitioners could be sustained in law. Under the U.P.C.H. Act 'consolidation ' is defined under Section 3 (2). Explanation (iii) of Section 3 (2) of the U.P.C.H. Act makes it clear that land mentioned under Section 132 of U.P. Zamindari Abolition & Land Reforms Act (in short hereinafter referred to as the U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act) shall not be included in consolidation Scheme.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.