JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) THIS appeal arises out of execution proceedings.
(2.) IT would appear that a mortgage decree was passed in favour of three brothers, namely, Ram
sewak, Ram Sudhist and Ram Naresh against one Sewak, minor, who is respondent No. 1 in this
appeal. After the said decree was passed, a two-third share belonging to two of the brothers,
namely, Ram Sewak and Ram Naresh was paid off and only the remaining one-third share
belonging to Ram Sudhist remained unsatisfied. Dhondhey Prasad son of Ram Sudhist put in an
application for execution In respect of the entire amount of the decree. An objection was made
on behalf of the judgment-debtor that the two-third share belonging to the two other
decree-holders having been paid off and satisfaction in respect of the said payment having been
recorded by the Court, execution should be allowed to proceed only in respect of the remaining
one-third share belonging to the applicant decree-holder. On behalf of the decree-holder, it was argued that payment should have been made to all the
decree-holders and any partial payment of the decree in respect of the shares of the other
decree-holders cannot be recorded or recognized by the Court and should therefore be ignored
altogether. The execution Court gave effect to the objection of the Judgment-debtor and held that
execution could be allowed to proceed only in respect of the remaining one-third share belonging
to the appellant decree-holder. The decree-holder took the matter up in appeal. His appeal having
been dismissed, he has filed this second appeal in the High Court.
(3.) HAVING heard learned Counsel for the appellant, I am of opinion that this appeal must be
dismissed. It may be noted at the very outset that it is not claimed on behalf of the appellant
decree-holder that he is entitled to the entire amount of the decree nor is it stated on his behalf
that the two other decree-holders were not entitled to two-third share which has been paid off to
them or to their heirs. On behalf of the decree-holder reliance has been placed on the provisions
of Order 21, Rule 1, Civil P. C. which provides as follows: "all money payable under a decree shall be paid as follows, namely (a ). . . . . . . . . . (b) out of Court to the decree-holder; or (c ). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ";
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.