JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) THIS is a defendant's appeal. It arises out of a suit brought by the plaintiff for arrears of rent
and ejectment. The ejectment of the defendant was sought on the ground that the defendant had
caused substantial damage to the accommodation under Section 3 (b), U. P. Control of Rent and
eviction Act.
(2.) THE defendant admitted his liability for arrears of rent but resisted the relief of ejectment on
the ground that he had not caused any damage to the building.
(3.) THE trial Court decreed the suit for arrears of rent. It, however, dismissed the suit for
ejectment holding that the defendant had not caused any damage. Dissatisfied with the judgment
of the trial Court on the question of ejectment, the plaintiff filed an appeal which came up for
hearing before Sri T. N. Chatterji, Civil Judge, Gonda. Before the lower appellate Court, it was
argued that the permission to file a suit for ejectment having been given by the rent control and
eviction officer the civil court was bound to decree the suit for ejectment. This argument was
accepted by the Court below which allowed the plaintiff's appeal and varied the decree of the
trial Court by decreeing ejectment also. The defendant has filed this second appeal against the
said judgment.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.