JUDGEMENT
RAN VIJAI SINGH, J. -
(1.) HEARD Sri Shailendra Singh,learned counsel for the petitioner,
learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Sri Arun
Kumar Srivastava,learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha.
(2.) THE submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the Plot
No. 78M measuring about 0.253 hectare was allotted to the
petitioner on lease and for cancellation of the said lease, a
proceeding was initiated under Sub -Section 4 of Section 198 of
U.P.Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, which was
numbered as Case No. 125 before the Additional Collector, Bijnor.
The application for cancellation was rejected on 8.3.1978.
Thereafter, name of the petitioner's father was recorded. After his
death, petitioner's name was recorded but the same was abruptly
expunged by the Tehsildar Dhampur vide order dated 18.1.2009 in
a proceeding under Section 33/39 of U.P.Land Revenue Act, 1901
( in short ' the Act') without there being any opportunity or notice
to the petitioner. The petitoner has filed revision that has been
dismissed as barred by time. The contention is that once the
application for cancellation of lease was rejected, the entries in the
revenue record in favour of the petitioner could not be expunged
under Section 33/39 of the Act. So far as time barred revision is
concerned, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that since
the order dated 18.1.2009 was an exparte order and when the
petitioner came to know about the same, he has filed revision and
there was no fault of the petitioner. In the submission of learned
counsel for the petitioner, on the basis of the impugned order, the
respondents are trying to dispossess the petitioner from the land in
dispute and in case the petitioner is dispossessed, he would suffer
irreparable loss and injury.
Matter requires scrutiny.
Issue notice.
Notices on behalf of respondents no. 1, 2 and 4 have been accepted
by the office of learned Chief Standing Counsel whereas Sri Arun
Kumar Srivastava has put in appearance on behalf of respondent
no. 3, therefore notice need not be served again to respondents no.
1 to 4.
(3.) LEARNED counsel for the respondents are granted six weeks' time to
file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed
within two weeks thereafter.
List thereafter.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.