NAGAR PALIKA SIYANA Vs. U.P.P.S.TRIBUNAL
LAWS(ALL)-2014-1-27
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on January 17,2014

Nagar Palika Siyana Appellant
VERSUS
U.P.P.S.Tribunal Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) Nagar Palika, Siyana District Bulandshahr has filed this writ petition against judgment and order dated 17.2.1994 passed by U.P. Public Services Tribunal II, Lucknow (in short 'Tribunal') in Claim Petition No. 137/II/88 filed by Sri Ram Prasad, respondent no. 2, setting aside termination order dated 27.2.1978 of respondent no. 2 with all consequential benefits of pay and allowances.
(2.) Facts of the case are based on allegations that respondent no. 2, Ram Prasad was temporarily appointed on the post of Toll Moharrir on 5.10.1966 in Town Area, Siyana, District Bulandshahr, which was later on upgraded as Nagar Palika, Siyana. The Town Area was under the charge of Officer-in-charge Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sadar in the year 1977 who made an inspection of Toll on 28.10.1977 where respondent no. 2 was working. During inspection, it was found that Ram Prasad, respondent no. 2, was found in possession of Rs. 70/- more-than the amount entered into Chungi Register maintained at Barrier. On being questioned by the Officer-in-charge, respondent no. 2 explained that extra amount was his personal cash money brought from home to meet the requirement of small change for returning the excess money to the tax-payers. The statement of respondent no. 2 was recorded. Later on, a notice dated 23.11.1977 was issued seeking his explanation and to show cause.
(3.) This time respondent no. 2 changed his version by stating that he brought Rs. 70/- from his home for purchasing food-grains from the market. The statement of respondent no. 2 dated 28.10.1977 and different version given pursuant to notice dated 23.11.1977 are available on record as Annexures-1 and 3 to the writ petition. Another opportunity was given to respondent no. 2 for explaining the discrepancies and in his third explanation dated 18.12.1977 (Annexure-5 to the writ petition). Respondent no. 2 again changed his version by saying that Rs. 70/- was his personal money required for making payment to the tax-payers as well as for purchasing food-grains for his personal consumption. It is pertinent to point-out that only Rs. 14.70P. were officially collected as Toll-tax by respondent no. 2 as per Chungi Register.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.