SHIV SHANKAR VAJPAYEE Vs. STATE OF U P
LAWS(ALL)-2014-11-320
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on November 21,2014

Shiv Shankar Vajpayee Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF U P Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State -respondents.
(2.) THE question which falls for consideration in these proceedings instituted by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is as to whether the services rendered by him since the date of his initial appointment on ad hoc basis till regularization of his services are to be treated to be 'qualifying service' and as to whether the said period rendered in service by the petitioner in ad hoc capacity has to be counted for the purpose of reckoning the pension.
(3.) THE petitioner was appointed on 03.07.1978 on the post of Junior Engineer in the Irrigation Department on adhoc basis. However, immediately after his appointment, he was sent on deputation to Betwa River Board, Jhansi under the Ministry of Agriculture and Irrigation, Government of India, where, by means of order dated 13.07.1978, he was posted at Rajghat Dam Construction Circle II, Rajghat, District Lalitpur. The petitioner, thereafter, was repatriated in the year 1981 and after being repatriated, he resumed his duty in his parent department, namely, Department of Irrigation, Government of U.P. on 31.07.1981. The petitioner since thereafter has been working continuously without any interruption and break in the Irrigation Department, Government of U.P. and the service benefits, as available to regular appointees, were also made available to him from time to time. His services were regularized by means of the order dated 26.02.1998 under the relevant provisions of U.P. Regularization of Ad hoc Appointments (On posts Outside the Purview of the Public Service Commission) Rules 1979 (hereinafter referred to "Regularization Rules, 1979"). The petitioner continued to serve the department until he retired on his attaining the age of superannuation on 31.12.2012. The pension papers appear to have been sent by the departmental authorities to the Additional Director, Treasury and Pension by means of letter dated 11.10.2012. The aforesaid papers for payment of pension, gratuity, commutation of pension etc. were examined by the office of Additional Director, Treasury and Pension wherein certain deficiencies were noticed by the official concerned in the office of Additional Director, Treasury and Pension. Accordingly, a letter from the office of the Additional Director, Treasury and Pension dated 30.11.2012 was written to the Executive Engineer, Irrigation Division, Ganga Sinchai Bhawan, Telibagh, Lucknow pointing out therein that in terms of the Government Order dated 29.05.2001, the challan pertaining to deposit of contribution to the pension for the period the petitioner was on deputation should be made available. In the said letter, it was also pointed out that petitioner's service book does not make mention of the period for which the petitioner remained on deputation and hence, the same may also be recorded.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.