SUNIL KUMAR PANDEY Vs. STATE OF UP
LAWS(ALL)-2014-10-24
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on October 16,2014

SUNIL KUMAR PANDEY Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF UP Respondents

JUDGEMENT

VISHNU CHANDRA GUPTA, J. - (1.) THIS petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner, namely, Sunil Kumar Pandey with a prayer to quash the order dated 07.12.2005 (Annexure -1) passed by Special Chief Judicial Magistrate Customs, Lucknow and the order dated 21.06.2002 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate (Economic Offences), Lucknow in Case No. 805 of 2002 summoning the petitioner under Sections 467, 468, 471, 419, 420 I.P.C.
(2.) BY means of the order dated 07.12.2005, the application for discharge moved by the petitioner in pursuance of the order passed by this Court in Misc. Case No. 1239 of 2002 has been rejected. The order dated 21.06.2002 has not been annexed with this writ petition.
(3.) I have heard Shri Pankaj Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State and also perused the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the State. The sole controversy in this case is that the resolution of the Gram Sabha alleged to have been approved by the S.D.M., namely, Shyam Sunder Sharma, which on verification, found that the signature of the S.D.M. Shyam Sunder Sharma on alleged approval was forged. Shri Shyam Sunder Sharma was called for in this regard and he categorically stated that his signature has been forged and he never accord any approval to the aforesaid resolution which alleged to have been approved in the year 1998.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.