Ramesh Sinha, J. - (1.) HEARD Sri Rajeev Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri L.D. Rajbhar, learned A.G.A. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the entire proceeding of charge sheet No. 651 of 2012 dated 20.11.2012 in Case Crime No. 124 of 2011, under Sections 406, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. Police Station -Chhibramau, District Kannauj.
(2.) THE contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that no offence against the applicant is disclosed and the present prosecution has been instituted with a malafide intention for the purposes of harassment. He pointed out certain documents and statements in support of his contention. From the perusal of the material on record and looking into the facts of the case at this stage it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the applicant. All the submissions made at the bar relate to the disputed questions of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. At this stage only prima facie case is to be seen in the light of the law laid down by Supreme Court in cases of R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab, : A.I.R. 1960 S.C. 866, State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal, : 1992 SCC (Cr.) 426, State of Bihar Vs. P.P. Sharma, : 1992 SCC (Cr.) 192 and lastly Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq and another (Para -10) : 2005 SCC (Cr.) 283. The disputed defence of the accused cannot be considered at this stage.
(3.) THE prayer for quashing of the aforesaid case based on charge sheet is refused.;