JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) HEARD the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.G.A.
(2.) THIS petition has been filed by the petitioners with a prayer to quash the F.I.R. in case crime no. 895 of 2014, under section 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 120B I.P.C., P.S. Kavi Nagar, District Ghaziabad.
(3.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner filed supplementary affidavit annexing therein a photocopy of the draft prepared in the name of respondent no. 3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in the present case the amount of Rs. 1,20,000/ - has been paid to the respondent no. 3 through bank draft.
From the perusal of the impugned F.I.R. it appears that on the basis of the allegations made therein a prima facie cognizable offence is made out. There is no ground for interference in the F.I.R. Therefore, the prayer for quashing the impugned F.I.R. is refused.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.