JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Heard Shri Krishnaji Khare
counsel for the applicant and Shri C. B.
Yadav, learned Chief Standing Counsel-II for
the opposite party No. 1.
(2.) At the first blush, this case appeared
to be an exercise in futility and I was about
to discharge the notices because the executor
of the judgment, Smt. Maya Niranjan,
had already been transferred from the post
and the order and judgment of the Court
had been complied by her successor, though
after more than four years when it was to
be complied within two months. It appeared
to be yet another case of stagnant officialdom
relying upon the procedural delays, which
mars the working of nearly every department
of the Government. But the counsel for the
applicant, a reasonable man, begged couple
of minutes, otherwise, he said, he would be
failing in his duty to the Courts and the society. With some reluctance, I agreed.
(3.) He started with some brief facts and
took me to certain paragraphs of the writ
judgment and couple of paragraphs of
counter-affidavit and its annexures. And he
stopped. I could not. We together read the
judgment, the petition and the counter with
its annexures. He was right. Though it was
agonizing reading, but it brought forth the
defiant and "care two hoots" attitude of Smt.
Maya Niranjan. A sense of helplessness
slowly crept in, but soon gave way to the
duty that I owe to the institution and the
society.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.