JUDGEMENT
V.C. Misra, J. -
(1.) Shri S.N. Srivastava, learned Counsel for the petitioners, Shri N.L. Srivastava, learned
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 and the learned Standing Counsel are present.
(2.) This writ petition has been filed seeking relief by way of a writ, order or direction in the
nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned order dated 13.10.1997 (Annexure 17 to the writ
petition) passed by Respondent No. 1, with further relief in the nature of mandamus
commanding the respondents not to interfere in the peaceful functioning of the Managing
Committee of Shiskha Parishad, Nagwa, district Ballia on the basis of the impugned order dated
13.10.1997.
(3.) The facts of the case in brief are that the petitioner had filed Writ Petition No. 25273 of 1994
for a direction to the Assistant Registrar, Firms, Chits and Societies-Respondent No. 4 to decide
the matter relating to renewal of registration of Shiksha Parishad, Nagwa, district Ballia. Since it
had not complied with the directions dated 21.7.1993 issued by this Court earlier in Writ Petition
No. 32640 of 1992 this Court disposed off the Writ Petition No. 25273 of 1994 with the direction
that the authority concerned will decide the dispute finally and expeditiously as possible and also
pass final orders on the renewal application in accordance with law. In pursuance of the said
order, the Registrar moved an application before this Court seeking permission to delegate his
authority, which was allowed and the Deputy Registrar concerned was delegated the work to
decide the same vide its order dated 4.4.1995 in favour of the petitioner. The Respondent No. 4
being aggrieved by the said order filed an appeal before the Commissioner, which was allowed
by it. Being aggrieved, the petitioner and Respondent No. 4 both challenged the same. Writ
Petition No. 26515 of 1995 filed by the petitioner was allowed and Writ Petition No. 29192 of
1995 filed by Respondent No. 4 was dismissed vide composite order dated 7.12.1995
(Annexure-13 to the writ petition) passed by this Court. A special appeal was filed challenging
the order dated 7.12.1995, which was dismissed by order dated 28.10.1997 of this Court.
However, a Writ Petition No. 27754 of 1997 was again filed by Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 in
which the petitioner was not impleaded as a party and the writ petition was disposed of with the
directions to the Registrar to consider the matter afresh and decide the question of validity of the
office bearers to manage and supervise the society in question. The Assistant Registrar-
Respondent No. 1 passed an order dated 23.10.1997 against the petitioner.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.