JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This application has been
filed under S. 482, Cr. P.C. for setting aside
the orders dated 2-9-1999 and 27-11-1999
passed by the learned District Judge,
Gorakhpur recommending the initiation of
criminal proceedings under S. 193, I.P.C.
against the applicant and consequent criminal proceedings, vide Complaint Case No.
6507 of 1999 under S. 193, I.P.C. (State v.
Sankhdhari Singh) pending in the Court of
the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gorakhpur.
(2.) The order dated 2-9-1999 recommending the prosecution of the applicant has been
passed on the ground that in a transfer application under S. 24, C.P.C. the applicant
is alleged to have stated that he was told by
the opposite party, his wife, Smt.
Prabhawati, the contestant, that her counsel was the colleague of the
Presiding Officer. This fact according to the complaining
Court was not correct. Secondly, in his affidavit the applicant has stated that he was
told this fact on 30-8-1999 by Smt.
Prabhawati, opposite party. But before the
Court he had stated that the disclosure has
been made to him by Smt. Prabhawati on
31-8-1999 and thus the Court observed that
there was a contradiction in the two versions. It was further stated that as the
learned counsel for Smt. Prabhawati was a
senior advocate he could not be the colleague
of the Presiding Officer, who was much
younger in age.
(3.) It appears that against the order dated
2-9-1999 rejecting the transfer application
of the applicant, the applicant moved Transfer Application No. 220 of 1999 before this
Court wherein this Court issued a direction
to the complaining Court to proceed in the
matter under S. 340, Cr. P.C. after giving an
opportunity to the applicant to show cause
as to why a criminal complaint should not
be filed against him. This Court further directed the trial Court
to dispose of the matter after receiving the reply of the show cause
notice and after consideration of the same.
Thereafter the applicant filed his reply, paper No. 8-C pursuant to the direction issued
by this Court.His reply was that due to slip
of tongue he has mentioned the date as
31 -8-1999 in place of 30-8-1999 and the statement
made by him was in respect of Rajesh
Khullar, Advocate son of Sri Kamal Kishore
Khullar, Advocate that he was the colleague
of the Presiding Officer. There was also a
prayer for mercy in case the Court did not
accept his contentions.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.