VIRENDRA KUMAR Vs. UNION OF INDIA
LAWS(ALL)-2004-9-149
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on September 01,2004

VIRENDRA KUMAR Appellant
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) R. S. Tripathi, J. Heard Counsel for the applicant, Sri Ganga Ram Gupta for the Union of India and perused the papers.
(2.) IN this case it is alleged that recovery of 252. 5 Kg. of Charas was made by the official of Narcotics Control Bureau, Varanasi. Thereafter, on arrest of the person from whom the above recovery was made the applicant was also apprehended on account of disclosure of certain facts. Statement of the applicant under Section 67 of NDPS Act was recorded wherein he has admitted that he has been involved in selling of Opium in Nepal. The applicant is related to the main accused Akhil as per his own statement. For the present it is argued that the statement recorded under Section 67 of NDPS Act is unnatural and not acceptable. I am of the opinion that the statement under Section 67 of NDPS Act is admissible and in that statement it has come that by selling contraband articles he had been receiving money and there is nothing to satisfy the requirements of Section 37 of the NDPS Act. Accordingly, this bail application is rejected. Special Judge concerned is directed to dispoe of the trial of the applicant as expeditiously as possible. Application rejected. .;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.