MATHURA TIWARI Vs. DISTRICT JUDGE OM PRAKASH TIWARI KASHI NATH TIWARI AND SUMER TIWARI
LAWS(ALL)-2004-11-8
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on November 24,2004

MATHURA TIWARI SON OF RAM CHARITAR TIWARI Appellant
VERSUS
DISTRICT JUDGE, OM PRAKASH TIWARI, KASHI NATH TIWARI AND SUMER TIWARI Respondents

JUDGEMENT

V.C. Misra, J. - (1.) The facts of the case in brief are that a money suit was filed in the Court below by the plaintiff-appellant (respondent No. 2 in this writ petition) against the defendant (petitioner in this writ petition) for an amount of Rs. 1500/- with interest thereupon on the basis of a pronote executed by one Sri Munni Tewari. After a period of two years from the death of said Muni Tewari the petitioner defendant inherited the property, assets and the libality of Munni Tewari. The said pronote was made the basis of the suit. The trial court vide its judgment and order dated 22.9.1984 (Annexure No. 3 to the writ petition) dismissed the suit since the pronote could not be proved in accordance with law. The plaintiff being aggrieved filed first appeal before the District Judge. Ballia- respondent No. 1, who vide its impugned order dated 11.8.1989 (Annexure No. 4 to the writ petition) allowed the appeal, set aside the judgment and decree of the trial court and decreed the plaintiffs suit (respondent No. 2 in the writ petition) with costs.
(2.) Feeling aggrieved by the order dated 11.8.1989 (Annexure No. 4 to the writ petition) of the respondent No. 1, the petitioner filed this writ petition.
(3.) The respondents till date have not filed their counter affidavit in rebuttal to the averments made in the writ petition, in spite of time being granted to them on several dates on the request of their learned Counsel. It is settled law that if no affidavit in rebuttal is filed and the averments made in the affidavit are not controverted then the said averments must be accepted as true and correct and the presumption is drawn in favour of the petitioner in terms of Section 114 Illustration (g) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, as laid down in catena of decisions including A.I.K. 1966 Alld. page 156 A.I.R. 1962 Alld. page 407 A.I.R. 1987 S.C. page 479 and 1999 (82) Factory Law Report page 709. In the absence of counter affidavit, this Court is left with no option but to accept the averments made in the writ petition to be correct and true.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.