HIRA PRASAD Vs. STATE OF U P
LAWS(ALL)-2004-7-54
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on July 08,2004

HIRA PRASAD Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) HEARD counsel for the parties.
(2.) THIS petition has been filed for quashing the impugned notice 26-7-1999, Annexure 1 to the writ petition by which the petitioner has been directed to obtain a licence under the Seeds ( Control) Order, 1983 which was issued under the Essential Commodities Act. Rule 3 (1) of the Seeds (Control) Order states that: "no person shall carry on business of selling importing and exporting seeds on any place except under and in accordance with the terms and condition of licence granted to him under this Order. " Shri Ajay Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that the petitioner does not sell import or export seeds as stated in para 10 (1) of the writ petition. Hence his business is not covered by the Seeds (Control) Order 1983. Learned Standing counsel has invited our attention to Annexure C. A. 1 to the counter affidavit which is a copy of the petitioner's application dated 4-8-1999 to the addressed to the District Agricultural Officer, Varanasi. In this application, the petitioner has stated that he prepares plants of certain fruit, trees and sells them.
(3.) IN our opinion, this cannot be called selling, exporting or importing the seeds. Hence the petitioner cannot be required to take licence under the Seeds (Control) Order. He has already obtained the licence under the Fruit Nursery (Regulation) Act, 1976, as stated in paras 8 and 10 of the writ petition. The writ petition is, therefore, allowed and the impugned notice dated 26- 7-1999 is quashed. Writ petition allowed. .;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.