JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Heard learned counsel for the
parties.
After hearing learned counsel for the parties,
I proceed to decide the writ petition at
the admission stage.
1. The plaintiff-petitioner had filed a suit
for permanent injunction against the respondent
opposite parties No. 7 and 8. Copy
of the plaint has been filed as Annexure No.
2 to the writ petition. According to the plaint,
petitioner has prayed that the respondents-
defendants may be restrained from raising
any construction over the adjoining land
towards west to plaintiffs house and also
not to interfere in plaintiffs peaceful possession.
According to the plaint, petitioners
had claimed the exclusive ownership of the
house in which they are residing.
(2.) An application was moved by the
opposite parties Nos. 1 to 6 under Order 1,
Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure for
impleadment as party. Copy of the application
has been filed as Annexure No. 4 to the
writ petition. According to the application
moved by the opposite parties Nos. 1 to 6,
they are the owners of the house in which
the plaintiff-petitioners reside. The petitioners
are the tenant of opposite parties Nos. 1
to 6. It has been pleaded by the opposite
parties Nos. 1 to 6 that in case the suit is
decreed, they may be suffering irreparable
loss on account of findings given by the
Court.
(3.) Application under Order 1 Rule 10 of
the Code of Civil Procedure was opposed by
the plaintiff-petitioner on the ground that
the suit was filed, relating to adjoining land
and no dispute has been raised for the house
in which the plaintiff-petitioner is residing.
Accordingly, third party like opposite parties
Nos. 1 to 6 have got no right of
impleadment as party in the Regular Suit
pending in the Court.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.