COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs. M S J ENGG AND CO
LAWS(ALL)-1993-2-26
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on February 08,1993

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Appellant
VERSUS
M.S.J. (ENGG. AND CO.) Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Om Prakash, J. - (1.) The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (Delhi Bench 'A'), has referred the following questions under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (briefly, "the Act"), for the opinion of this court : " 1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in holding that the Income-tax Officer had exercised his discretion in not charging interest under Section 217(1A) in the original assessment ?
(2.) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in holding that interest under Section 217(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, could not be charged by taking recourse to Section 154 ?" 2. The relevant assessment year is 1972-73. The assessee, a partnership firm, carried on the business of manufacture and sale of earth digging equipment and it also derived income from Government contracts. During the financial year 1971-72, relevant to the assessment year 1972-73, the assessee was required to pay advance tax of Rs. 3,830 under Section 210 of the Act, which was computed on the basis of income of Rs. 55,640 for the assessment year 1970-71. On regular assessment, the total income of the assessee and the tax chargeable for the assessment year 1972-73 were determined at Rs. 3,69,270 and Rs. 85,498, respectively. The assessee paid instalments of advance tax which had become due on September 15, and December 15, as demanded under Section 210 of the Act. Since the current income of the assessee was greater than the income on which the advance tax was demanded by the Income-tax Officer, it was obligatory on the part of the assessee to submit its estimate of advance tax under Section 212(3A) at any time before the date on which the last instalment of advance tax became due which the assessee filed on March 15, 1972. The Assessing Officer was of the view that, under Section 212(3A) of the Act, the estimate should have been filed by the assessee before March 15, 1972, that is, on or before March 14, 1972, and that having been filed after March 14, 1972, on March 15, 1972, when the last instalment of advance tax became due, interest under Section 217(1A) was clearly chargeable. As the same was not charged at the time of regular assessment made under Section 143(3), he was of the view that a mistake apparent from the record in not charging interest under Section 217(1A) had arisen and, therefore, he issued a notice under Section 154 of the Act calling upon the assessee to show cause why the interest under Section 217(1 A) be not charged, non-charging of which in the regular assessment being a mistake apparent from the record.
(3.) The assessee filed a reply contending that there was no mistake apparent from the record and that, therefore, the impugned notice under Section 154 could not have been issued. The Income-tax Officer rejected the contention of the assessee. He, therefore, worked out the interest chargeable under Section 217(1A) at Rs. 8,295 and charged the same by his order passed under Section 154.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.