JUDGEMENT
T.Ramabhadran, J. -
(1.) This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution as well as Section 491, Cr. P. C.
praying for the Issue of a writ in the nature of habeas corpus directing the release of the applicant
Radhey Shyam, Bharti, who happens to be a practising lawyer of district Shahjahanpur.
(2.) The applicant was arrested at 5 a. m. on 27-2-1963 by opposite party No. 3 Sri Saiduddin, S.
O. Police Station Sadar Bazar in the city of Shahjahanpur, and confined in the district Jail
Shahjahanpur. The same day at 5 P. M. opposite party No. 2 Sri C. 8. Negi, City Magistrate
Shahjahanpur came to the district jail and read out a notice under Bee. 112 Cr. P. C. calling upon
the applicant to show cause why he should not be ordered to execute a personal Bond of Rs.
5,000/- and furnish two sureties in a like amount to, keep the peace fox-one year.
The applicant, as the record shows, denied the contents of the notice. A further order under
Section 117 (3), Criminal P. C. was then passed by the City Magistrate directing the applicant to
execute a personal bond for the amount mentioned above and furnish two sureties to Keep the
peace till the conclusion of the enquiry. Since the applicant did not furnish the required sureties
he was directed to be Kept in jail. On 19-3-1963 the applicant was released from custody on his
furnishing the necessary surety bonds.
(3.) In this petition it has been contended that the arrest and the detention of the applicant in the
jail were illegal and accordingly the applicant, prayed firstly that the proceedings pending
against Mm under Section 107 Cr. P. C. in the court of the City Magistrate, Shahjahanpur, be
quashed and further that a writ of habeas corpus be issued to the City Magistrate, directing that
the applicant be set at liberty.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.