JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) THIS is a revision arising out of a complaint which has been instituted against the applicants
under section 210 of the Indian Penal Code by order of a Civil Judge of Saharanpur passed on
the 1st November, 1947, allowing an appeal from the order of the City Munsif dated the 12th
october 1946 on an application made before it praying that a complaint be made against the
applicants under section 476 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for their prosecution under
section 210 and other sections of the Indian Penal Code.
(2.) THERE was a revision from the order of the Civil Judge before the High Court and it was
dismissed on the 4th March, 1949. Thereafter a complaint was made and is now proceeding
before a Magistrate. In the Magistrate's court an objection was taken on behalf of the applicants
that the proceedings out of which the application under section 476 of the Code of Criminal
procedure arose had taken place before the Havali Munsif at Saharanpur and that an application
under section 476 of the Code of Criminal Procedure did not lie before the City Munsif,
saharanpur, and that, therefore, the Civil Judge of Saha-ranpur had no jurisdiction to direct that a
complaint be made against the applicants for their prosecution under section 210 of the Indian
penal Code. He rejected the objection and the revision to the Sessions Court from the order of
the learned Magistrate was dismissed by that court. The applicants have now come in revision to
this Court and it is urged that the proceedings that are now going on in the court of the
magistrate are without jurisdiction.
(3.) IT is also said that a previous application under section 476 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
having been dismissed by the Munsif a second application with respect to the same facts did not
lie and that the further proceedings aris-ing therefrom were without jurisdiction.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.