JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) THESE are four Government appeals against the orders of acquittals passed in four cases for
prosecution under the United Provinces Prevention of Adulteration Act, Act No. 6 of 1912.
(2.) IT would be convenient to take up the three cases, Criminal Appeal No. 143 of 1951, Criminal
appeal No. 144 of 1951 and Criminal Appeal No. 146 of 1951 together, and Criminal Appeal
no. 420 of 1951 separately. In Criminal Appeal No. 143 of 1951 and Criminal Appeal No 146 of
1951 the accused Balmakand and Amar Nath respectively were charged with having sold
adulterated Lahi oil, while in Criminal Appeal No. 144 of 1951 Amar Nath was prosecuted for
having sold adulterated Alsi oil.
(3.) THE accused are wholesale dealers. The Sanitary Inspector suspected that the Lahi and Alsi
oils sold by the accused were adulterated and he thereupon went and purchased some quantity of
oils. These he sent to the Public Analyst, U. P. Government, for analysis and report. The Analyst
found that the samples sent were all adulterated and thereupon the accused were prosecuted
before Sri R. D. Pande, Additional Magistrate, 1st class, Naini Tal. The learned Magistrate tried
the cases summarily and acquitted the accused on the ground that the accused were protected by
section 6 of the Act. It is against these orders of acquittal passed by the learned Magistrate that
these appeals have been filed. It has been urged on behalf of the State that the view taken by the
learned Magistrate that the accused were entitled to rely on Section 6 was erroneous.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.