JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) THIS is an application in revision against an order of the Sessions Judge refusing to Interfere
with an order passed by a Magistrate, first class, under Section 133, Cr. P. C. , requiring the
applicant to remove an obstruction from a public way.
(2.) MAHABIR and Babadin made an application to the Sub Divisional Magistrate under Section
133, Cr. P. C. , against Chandrapal and two others praying that the applicants should be ordered
to remove the obstruction which they had placed on a public way inasmuch as the applicants had
parked their bullockcart, had set up some troughs and were tying cattle in the way. On receipt of
this application the Magistrate asked for a report from the police and the Tahsildar and on being
satisfied that there was obstruction, issued a preliminary notice to the applicants to show cause
why they should not be ordered to remove the obstruction.
(3.) THE applicants appeared before the Magistrate and filed a written statement in which they
denied the existence of a public way and further alleged that they had been in possession of the
piece of land on which they had been parking buliockcart and tying their cattle for quite a long
time. They also in their statement alleged that if necessary a jury may be appointed.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.