MOHD AHMAD @ ACCHEY Vs. STATE OF U P
LAWS(ALL)-2013-1-432
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on January 21,2013

Mohd Ahmad @ Acchey Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF U P Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri R. K. Singh, learned counsel appearing for the complainant and learned Additional Government Advocate.
(2.) THIS writ petition has been filed for quashing of an FIR in case crime No. 432 of 2012 under sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B and 506 I.P.C., P.S. Puramufti, District Kaushambi.
(3.) THE writ court is not competent to go into questions of facts and on the allegations, it cannot be said that no prima facie case is disclosed. Hence, no ground exists for quashing the FIR or staying the arrest of the petitioners.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.