JUDGEMENT
SIBGHAT ULLAH KHAN,J. -
(1.) IT is shocking that ad interim injunction is being extended from date to date
for more than five years during which period about fifty dates may have been
fixed in Original Suit No.308 of 2007 Phool Kumari vs. Rajendra and others
pending before Civil Judge (Junior Division), City, Jaunpur. Learned counsel
for the petitioner states that 15.5.2013 is the next date fixed. Under no
circumstances final consideration of and decision on temporary injunction
application shall be delayed. The matter shall be heard on 15.5.2013. The
learned Presiding Officer shall realise that it is nothing short of a torture upon
the defendants to extend ad interim temporary injunction for five years and
not deciding temporary injunction application finally. He must be careful in
future. However, if due to unavoidable circumstances the case is adjourned on
15.5.2013 then on the next date the Temporary Injunction application shall positively be heard. If plaintiff seeks any adjournment on any ground or
advocates are on strike on any date ad interim injunction shall not be extended
and specific order must be passed that ad interim injunction is not extended.
This practice shall be followed in all suits.
Writ petition is disposed of.
Office is directed to send a copy of this order to District Judge, Jaunpur to
circulate the same to all the judges of his district.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.