MAHAVEER PRASAD VERMA Vs. CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
LAWS(ALL)-2013-1-97
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD (AT: LUCKNOW)
Decided on January 17,2013

Mahaveer Prasad Verma Appellant
VERSUS
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner Sri Anoop Srivastava, Sri I.H. Farooqui, learned counsel for Union of India.
(2.) Since pure question of law is involved, Sri I. H. Farooqui, does not intend to file counter affidavit. Hence with the consent of parties counsel, we proceed to decide the writ petition at the admission stage.
(3.) Instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been preferred against the impugned order passed by Central Administrative Tribunal, rejecting the petitioner's application for review/recall of order dated 10.1.2012, passed in Civil Contempt Petition No.22/2009.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.