JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) COMMON questions involved in all the aforesaid applications
relate to the question as to whether liability can be transferred to
subsequent buyer of the company which has drawn cheques for
discharge of its debt or liability under Section 138 of Negotiable
Instruments Act (herein after referred to as N.I. Act). Since this
question is involved in all the aforesaid applications, it is deemed
proper to decide them by a common judgement.
(2.) IN order to determine this issued Application U/s 482 No. 14646 of 2012 is taken as leading case and in order to appreciate the
controversy involved certain facts are required to be noted for proper
adjudication of the case, which is as under:
Vishal Retail limited is duly registered under the Companies Act having its registered and Corporate office at Plot No. 332, Near Telco
Service Station, Behind Shokeen Farmlands, Rangpuri Extension, New
Delhi. Applicants No. 1 to 3 are Directors of the Company. Respondent
no. 2 (hereinafter called as the complainant) is in the business of
Garment stitching and manufacturing of ready -made garments.
Applicants accused had a running agreement with the complainant for
stitching of garments of the cloths/fabric/materials which were supplied
by the accused applicants i.e. Vishal Retails Limited. As per agreed
terms, the accused applicants company were required to make
payments of the job work conducted by the complainant within
stipulated time span of 60 -75 days from the date of delivery of finished
goods which was supplied against way bill issued by the accused
persons. As agreed upon in terms of the agreement accused persons
have issued post dated cheques to the complainant. Every thing went
on smoothly until March 2011. Cheques which were issued for its
encashment after March, 2011 could not be encashed as a result of
which present controversy has arisen. In the present case, Cheque No.
477738 for an amount of Rs 6,45,510.00 was issued on 16.4.2011 drawn on A/c No. 31003763038, SBI, South Extension, New Delhi. Aforesaid
cheque was presented by the complainant to their bankers in Bhadohi
where they are carrying their business. The said cheque was
presented on 27.4.2011 which was returned with memo of the Bank
that the cheque could not be cleared due to insufficient funds.
(3.) STATUTORY notice was issued by the complainant to the accused to make the payment within a period prescribed therein. Receiving no
response from the applicants in this behalf present complaint has been
filed before the Trial Court.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.