JUDGEMENT
KALIMULLAH KHAN,J. -
(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
This is second bail application made on behalf of the accused applicant
Shaukat. His first bail application has already been rejected on merit by order
dated 24.1.2012.
(2.) THIS second bail application has been pressed on following two grounds: Firstly, that under similar circumstances co accused Kadir Pahalwan @
Kaddan and Mama @ Azad have been granted bail by different Benches of
this Court.
Secondly that the applicant is in jail since 13.9.2010. The charge under
section 364 I.P.C. was framed against him on 1.4.2011. Till date P.W. 1 was
examined in chief on 19.10.2011. His examination in chief was not completed
by the prosecution and thereafter dozen of dates have been fixed up by the
court but the prosecution has not been able to produce either of the witnesses
against the accused.
The main purpose for lodging the accused in jail is to facilitate the trial without any undue pressure inducement or threat to the prosecution
witnesses, but it is not proper that accused is kept in jail and the
prosecution witnesses be not examined for a considerable length of time
to give an impression of pre trial conviction.
The delayed trial and lethargic attitude adopted by the prosecution in the
matter of adducing prosecution witnesses entitles the applicant to bail.
(3.) LET the applicant Shaukat involved in case Crime No. 268 of 2010 under sections 364 I.P.C., police station Baniyather, District Moradabad be
released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties
each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.