JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Supplementary affidavit filed today on behalf of the applicant be taken on
record.
The present bail application has been moved on behalf of the accused -
applicant for enlarging him on bail in Case Crime No.177 of 2012, under
Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 506, 120 -B, 406 IPC, P.S. Vijay Nagar, District
Ghaziabad.
(2.) Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
It has been argued on behalf of the accused -applicant that the case of the
accused -applicant is similar to that of co -accused Shyam Singh, who has been
granted bail by another Bench of this Court vide its order dated 28.8.2012
passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.21083 of 2012, because forged
account is said to have been opened in the name of Vipin Kumar Pal and that
the role of the applicant and that of co -accused Shyam Singh is said to be that
of conspiracy only, so on the ground of parity with co -accused Shyam Singh,
the accused -applicant should also be enlarged on bail.
(3.) The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but has conceded that the case of the accused -applicant is similar to that of co -accused Shyam Singh.
Since the case of the accused -applicant is similar to that of co -accused Shyam
Singh, who has been granted bail by the another bench of this court so on the
ground of parity the applicant also deserves to be enlarged on bail.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.