COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs. SUSHILA MALLICK
LAWS(ALL)-2013-7-171
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD (AT: LUCKNOW)
Decided on July 31,2013

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Appellant
VERSUS
Sushila Mallick Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) Present appeal is filed by the department under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the judgment and order dated 31.01.2011 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Lucknow, in Income Tax Appeal No.678/LKW/2009, for the assessment year 2006-07.
(2.) On 11.01.2013, a Coordinate Bench of this Court has admitted the instant appeal on the following substantial question of law: "Whether, the assessee does not fulfill the conditions provided under Clause (i) of Sub-section (2) of Section 36 of the Income Tax Act, being not engaged in the regular business of money lending and accordingly, the judgment and order of the Tribunal, is substantially illegal?"
(3.) The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is engaged in the money lending business. The assessee has deposited a sum of Rs.34.0 lacs in the form of fixed deposit with M/s City Cooperative Bank Limited; and Badla deposit of Rs.5 lacs with M/s. Century Consultants Ltd., Lucknow. Thus, the total amount was Rs.39 lacs in both the deposits. The assessee has written the said amount as bad debt in the books of account. During the scrutiny, the A.O. opined that the said amount is a capital investment and cannot be written off as a bad debt. The CIT (A) has confirmed the order. Being aggrieved, the assessee has filed the second appeal before the Tribunal who has deleted the said addition. Not being satisfied, the department has knocked the door of this Court by filing the present appeal.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.