RANJEET KUMAR GUPTA Vs. STATE OF U P
LAWS(ALL)-2013-12-138
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on December 18,2013

RANJEET KUMAR GUPTA Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF U P Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) Petitioner claims compassionate appointment after the death of Smt. Urmila Devi working on the post of Auxiliary Nurse and Midwife, contending that he is her adopted son, but the said claim has been rejected by Chief Medical Officer, Mirzapur by means of impugned order dated 25.7.2013 stating that petitioner did not produce any document to show that he is adopted son of deceased employee. Learned counsel for petitioner during the course of argument admitted that there does not appear to be executed any adoption deed and also could not show as to how and in what manner the adoption took place in accordance with procedure of adoption prescribed in Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as "Act, 1956").
(2.) Section 16 of Act, 1956, as it originally was, reads as under: "16. Presumption as to registered documents relating to adoption.- Whenever any document registered under any law for the time being in force is produced before any court purporting to record an adoption made and is signed by the person giving and the person taking the child in adoption, the court shall presume that the adoption has been made in compliance with the provisions of this Act unless and until it is disproved."
(3.) Vide Section 35 of U.P. Civil Laws (Reforms and Amendment) Act, 1976, Section Section 16 of Act, 1956 was amended with effect from 1.1.1977 as under: "Renumber section 16 as sub-section (1) thereof and after sub-section (1) as so renumbered, the following sub-section (2) shall be inserted, namely:- (2) In case of an adoption made on or after the 1st day of January, 1977 no court in Uttar Pradesh shall accept any evidence in proof of the giving and taking of the child in adoption, except a document recording an adoption, made and signed by the person giving and the person taking the child in adoption and registered under any law for the time being in force; Provided that secondary evidence of such document shall be admitted in the circumstances and the manner laid down in the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.";


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.