A.K. PANDEY AND ANR. (COMPLAINT CASE) Vs. THE STATE OF U.P. AND ANR.
LAWS(ALL)-2013-1-395
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on January 24,2013

A.K. Pandey And Anr. (Complaint Case) Appellant
VERSUS
The State of U.P. And Anr. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Sudhir Kumar Saxena, J. - (1.) PETITIONERS ' counsel is permitted to carry out necessary correction in the memo of the petition during course of the date. Issue notice to opposite party no. 2, who may file counter affidavit within six weeks.
(2.) LIST after six weeks. Till the next date of listing, the further proceedings of criminal complaint case no. 350 of 2012 (Mohd. Fahim Vs. Arun Saxena and Ors.), under Sections 323,382,506 IPC, P.S. Hathigawan, District Pratapgarh, pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kunda, Pratapgarh, shall remain stayed.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.