JUDGEMENT
B.S. Chauhan, J. -
(1.) This writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 16.2.2003 (Annexure-1), passed
by the respondent No. 1, by which the representation of the petitioner has been rejected.
(2.) Facts and circumstances of the case giving rise to this case are that the petitioner and the
respondent No. 2 have been working in the respondent University and the selection of the
respondent No. 2 has been in dispute. However, the matter is still pending for consideration
before the Lucknow Bench of this Court wherein operation of the order passed by the respondent
No. 1 University has also been stayed. The respondent No. 1 issued a tentative seniority list on
20th June, 1998, wherein, the respondent No. 2 has been shown senior to the petitioner.
Petitioner being aggrieved made representation to correct the seniority list contending that he
was senior to the respondent No. 2. As it was not done, he filed Writ Petition No. 50567 of 2002
before this Court which was disposed of vide order dated 26.11.2002 directing the respondent
No. 1 to decide the representation of the petitioner. The respondent No. 1 has rejected the
representation by the impugned order dated 16.2.2003 (Annexure-1). Hence, this petition.
(3.) Shri Varshney and Shri U.N. Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the respondents have
raised a preliminary objection regarding maintainability of the writ petition, contending that
petitioner has approached this Court without exhausting the statutory remedy provided under
Section 68 of the U. P. State Universities Act, 1973 (hereinafter called the Act, 1973). Hence, the
petition is liable to be dismissed and petitioner may approach the learned Chancellor to decide
the controversy.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.